0.10/0.10 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.10/0.13 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.BORyxwK4DT true 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 960 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 120 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Aug 9 07:20:12 EDT 2022 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime : 0.13/0.34 % Running portfolio for 960 s 0.13/0.34 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.13/0.34 % Number of cores: 8 0.13/0.34 % Python version: Python 3.6.8 0.13/0.34 % Running in HO mode 0.44/0.62 % Total configuration time : 828 0.44/0.62 % Estimated wc time : 1656 0.44/0.62 % Estimated cpu time (8 cpus) : 207.0 0.50/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/40_c.s.sh running for 80s 0.50/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/35_full_unif4.sh running for 80s 0.50/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/40_c_ic.sh running for 80s 0.50/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/40_noforms.sh running for 90s 0.50/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/15_e_short1.sh running for 30s 0.50/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/40_b.comb.sh running for 70s 0.50/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/30_sp5.sh running for 60s 0.50/0.72 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/20_acsne_simpl.sh running for 40s 252.39/32.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/30_b.l.sh running for 90s 315.39/40.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/35_full_unif.sh running for 56s 381.23/49.05 % Solved by lams/40_noforms.sh. 381.23/49.05 % running E: timeout 44 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/eprover-ho --pos-ext=all --neg-ext=all /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.BORyxwK4DT/e_input0b11ce --cpu-limit=42 --auto-schedule -s -p 381.23/49.05 % done 1405 iterations in 48.279s 381.23/49.05 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p' 381.23/49.05 % SZS output start Refutation 381.23/49.05 thf(all_of_type, type, all_of: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o). 381.23/49.05 thf(sk__108_type, type, sk__108: $i). 381.23/49.05 thf(n_is_type, type, n_is: $i > $i > $o). 381.23/49.05 thf(n_1_type, type, n_1: $i). 381.23/49.05 thf(l_or_type, type, l_or: $o > $o > $o). 381.23/49.05 thf(moreis_type, type, moreis: $i > $i > $o). 381.23/49.05 thf(in_type, type, in: $i > $i > $o). 381.23/49.05 thf(imp_type, type, imp: $o > $o > $o). 381.23/49.05 thf(nat_type, type, nat: $i). 381.23/49.05 thf(sk__110_type, type, sk__110: $i). 381.23/49.05 thf(l_some_type, type, l_some: $i > ($i > $o) > $o). 381.23/49.05 thf(is_of_type, type, is_of: $i > ($i > $o) > $o). 381.23/49.05 thf(e_is_type, type, e_is: $i > $i > $i > $o). 381.23/49.05 thf(non_type, type, non: $i > ($i > $o) > $i > $o). 381.23/49.05 thf(n_some_type, type, n_some: ($i > $o) > $o). 381.23/49.05 thf(ordsucc_type, type, ordsucc: $i > $i). 381.23/49.05 thf(n_pl_type, type, n_pl: $i > $i > $i). 381.23/49.05 thf(sk__109_type, type, sk__109: $i). 381.23/49.05 thf(sk__92_type, type, sk__92: $i > $i > $i). 381.23/49.05 thf(d_29_ii_type, type, d_29_ii: $i > $i > $o). 381.23/49.05 thf(d_not_type, type, d_not: $o > $o). 381.23/49.05 thf(diffprop_type, type, diffprop: $i > $i > $i > $o). 381.23/49.05 thf(def_moreis, axiom,(( moreis ) = 381.23/49.05 (^[X0:$i,X1:$i]: ( l_or @ ( d_29_ii @ X0 @ X1 ) @ ( n_is @ X0 @ X1 ) )))). 381.23/49.05 thf(def_d_29_ii, axiom,(( d_29_ii ) = 381.23/49.05 (^[X0:$i,X1:$i]: ( n_some @ ( diffprop @ X0 @ X1 ) )))). 381.23/49.05 thf(def_diffprop, axiom,(( diffprop ) = 381.23/49.05 (^[X0:$i,X1:$i,X2:$i]: ( n_is @ X0 @ ( n_pl @ X1 @ X2 ) )))). 381.23/49.05 thf(def_n_is, axiom,(( n_is ) = (e_is @ nat))). 381.23/49.05 thf(def_e_is, axiom,(( e_is ) = (^[X0:$i,X:$i,Y:$i]: ( ( X ) = ( Y ) )))). 381.23/49.05 thf('0', plain, (( e_is ) = ( ^[X0:$i,X:$i,Y:$i]: ( ( X ) = ( Y ) ) )), 381.23/49.05 inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [def_e_is])). 381.23/49.05 thf('1', plain, 381.23/49.05 (( e_is ) = ( ^[V_1:$i,V_2:$i,V_3:$i]: ( ( V_2 ) = ( V_3 ) ) )), 381.23/49.05 define([status(thm)])). 381.23/49.05 thf('2', plain, (( n_is ) = ( e_is @ nat )), 381.23/49.05 inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [def_n_is, '1'])). 381.23/49.05 thf('3', plain, (( n_is ) = ( e_is @ nat )), define([status(thm)])). 381.23/49.05 thf('4', plain, 381.23/49.05 (( diffprop ) = 381.23/49.05 ( ^[X0:$i,X1:$i,X2:$i]: ( n_is @ X0 @ ( n_pl @ X1 @ X2 ) ) )), 381.23/49.05 inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [def_diffprop, '3', '1'])). 381.23/49.05 thf('5', plain, 381.23/49.05 (( diffprop ) = 381.23/49.05 ( ^[V_1:$i,V_2:$i,V_3:$i]: ( n_is @ V_1 @ ( n_pl @ V_2 @ V_3 ) ) )), 381.23/49.05 define([status(thm)])). 381.23/49.05 thf(def_n_some, axiom,(( n_some ) = (l_some @ nat))). 381.23/49.05 thf(def_l_some, axiom,(( l_some ) = 381.23/49.05 (^[X0:$i,X1:( $i > $o )]: 381.23/49.05 ( d_not @ ( all_of @ ( ^[X2:$i]: ( in @ X2 @ X0 ) ) @ ( non @ X0 @ X1 ) ) )))). 381.23/49.05 thf(def_non, axiom,(( non ) = 381.23/49.05 (^[X0:$i,X1:( $i > $o ),X2:$i]: ( d_not @ ( X1 @ X2 ) )))). 381.23/49.05 thf(def_d_not, axiom,(( d_not ) = (^[X0:$o]: ( imp @ X0 @ $false )))). 381.23/49.05 thf(def_imp, axiom,(( imp ) = (^[X0:$o,X1:$o]: ( ( X0 ) => ( X1 ) )))). 381.23/49.05 thf('6', plain, (( imp ) = ( ^[X0:$o,X1:$o]: ( ( X0 ) => ( X1 ) ) )), 381.23/49.05 inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [def_imp])). 381.23/49.05 thf('7', plain, (( imp ) = ( ^[V_1:$o,V_2:$o]: ( ( V_1 ) => ( V_2 ) ) )), 381.23/49.05 define([status(thm)])). 381.23/49.05 thf('8', plain, (( d_not ) = ( ^[X0:$o]: ( imp @ X0 @ $false ) )), 381.23/49.05 inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [def_d_not, '7'])). 381.23/49.05 thf('9', plain, (( d_not ) = ( ^[V_1:$o]: ( imp @ V_1 @ $false ) )), 381.23/49.05 define([status(thm)])). 381.23/49.05 thf('10', plain, 381.23/49.05 (( non ) = ( ^[X0:$i,X1:( $i > $o ),X2:$i]: ( d_not @ ( X1 @ X2 ) ) )), 381.23/49.05 inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [def_non, '9', '7'])). 381.23/49.05 thf('11', plain, 381.23/49.05 (( non ) = 381.23/49.05 ( ^[V_1:$i,V_2:( $i > $o ),V_3:$i]: ( d_not @ ( V_2 @ V_3 ) ) )), 381.23/49.05 define([status(thm)])). 381.23/49.05 thf(def_all_of, axiom,(( all_of ) = 381.23/49.05 (^[X0:( $i > $o ),X1:( $i > $o )]: 381.23/49.05 ( ![X2:$i]: ( ( is_of @ X2 @ X0 ) => ( X1 @ X2 ) ) )))). 381.23/49.05 thf(def_is_of, axiom,(( is_of ) = (^[X0:$i,X1:( $i > $o )]: ( X1 @ X0 )))). 381.23/49.05 thf('12', plain, (( is_of ) = ( ^[X0:$i,X1:( $i > $o )]: ( X1 @ X0 ) )), 381.23/49.05 inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [def_is_of])). 381.23/49.05 thf('13', plain, (( is_of ) = ( ^[V_1:$i,V_2:( $i > $o )]: ( V_2 @ V_1 ) )), 381.23/49.05 define([status(thm)])). 381.23/49.05 thf('14', plain, 381.23/49.05 (( all_of ) = 381.23/49.05 ( ^[X0:( $i > $o ),X1:( $i > $o )]: 381.23/49.05 ( ![X2:$i]: ( ( is_of @ X2 @ X0 ) => ( X1 @ X2 ) ) ) )), 381.23/49.05 inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [def_all_of, '13'])). 381.23/49.05 thf('15', plain, 381.23/49.05 (( all_of ) = 381.23/49.05 ( ^[V_1:( $i > $o ),V_2:( $i > $o )]: 381.23/49.05 ( ![X4:$i]: ( ( is_of @ X4 @ V_1 ) => ( V_2 @ X4 ) ) ) )), 381.23/49.05 define([status(thm)])). 381.23/49.05 thf('16', plain, 381.23/49.05 (( l_some ) = 381.23/49.05 ( ^[X0:$i,X1:( $i > $o )]: 381.23/49.05 ( d_not @ 381.23/49.05 ( all_of @ ( ^[X2:$i]: ( in @ X2 @ X0 ) ) @ ( non @ X0 @ X1 ) ) ) )), 381.23/49.05 inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], 381.23/49.05 [def_l_some, '11', '9', '7', '15', '13'])). 381.23/49.05 thf('17', plain, 381.23/49.05 (( l_some ) = 381.23/49.05 ( ^[V_1:$i,V_2:( $i > $o )]: 381.23/49.05 ( d_not @ 381.23/49.05 ( all_of @ ( ^[V_3:$i]: ( in @ V_3 @ V_1 ) ) @ ( non @ V_1 @ V_2 ) ) ) )), 381.23/49.05 define([status(thm)])). 381.23/49.05 thf('18', plain, (( n_some ) = ( l_some @ nat )), 381.23/49.05 inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], 381.23/49.05 [def_n_some, '17', '11', '9', '7', '15', '13'])). 381.23/49.05 thf('19', plain, (( n_some ) = ( l_some @ nat )), define([status(thm)])). 381.23/49.05 thf('20', plain, 381.23/49.05 (( d_29_ii ) = ( ^[X0:$i,X1:$i]: ( n_some @ ( diffprop @ X0 @ X1 ) ) )), 381.23/49.05 inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], 381.23/49.05 [def_d_29_ii, '5', '19', '3', '1', '17', '11', '9', '7', '15', 381.23/49.05 '13'])). 381.23/49.05 thf('21', plain, 381.23/49.05 (( d_29_ii ) = 381.23/49.05 ( ^[V_1:$i,V_2:$i]: ( n_some @ ( diffprop @ V_1 @ V_2 ) ) )), 381.23/49.05 define([status(thm)])). 381.23/49.05 thf(def_l_or, axiom,(( l_or ) = (^[X0:$o]: ( imp @ ( d_not @ X0 ) )))). 381.23/49.05 thf('22', plain, (( l_or ) = ( ^[X0:$o]: ( imp @ ( d_not @ X0 ) ) )), 381.23/49.05 inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [def_l_or, '9', '7'])). 381.23/49.05 thf('23', plain, (( l_or ) = ( ^[V_1:$o]: ( imp @ ( d_not @ V_1 ) ) )), 381.23/49.05 define([status(thm)])). 381.23/49.05 thf('24', plain, 381.23/49.05 (( moreis ) = 381.23/49.05 ( ^[X0:$i,X1:$i]: ( l_or @ ( d_29_ii @ X0 @ X1 ) @ ( n_is @ X0 @ X1 ) ) )), 381.23/49.05 inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], 381.23/49.05 [def_moreis, '21', '5', '19', '3', '1', '17', '11', '23', '9', 381.23/49.05 '7', '15', '13'])). 381.23/49.05 thf('25', plain, 381.23/49.05 (( moreis ) = 381.23/49.05 ( ^[V_1:$i,V_2:$i]: 381.23/49.05 ( l_or @ ( d_29_ii @ V_1 @ V_2 ) @ ( n_is @ V_1 @ V_2 ) ) )), 381.23/49.05 define([status(thm)])). 381.23/49.05 thf(satz25a, conjecture, 381.23/49.05 (all_of @ 381.23/49.05 ( ^[X0:$i]: ( in @ X0 @ nat ) ) @ 381.23/49.05 ( ^[X0:$i]: 381.23/49.05 ( all_of @ 381.23/49.05 ( ^[X1:$i]: ( in @ X1 @ nat ) ) @ 381.23/49.05 ( ^[X1:$i]: 381.23/49.05 ( ( d_29_ii @ X1 @ X0 ) => ( moreis @ X1 @ ( ordsucc @ X0 ) ) ) ) ) ))). 381.23/49.05 thf(zf_stmt_0, conjecture, 381.23/49.05 (![X4:$i]: 381.23/49.05 ( ( in @ X4 @ nat ) => 381.23/49.05 ( ![X6:$i]: 381.23/49.05 ( ( in @ X6 @ nat ) => 381.23/49.05 ( ( ~( ![X8:$i]: 381.23/49.05 ( ( in @ X8 @ nat ) => ( ( X6 ) != ( n_pl @ X4 @ X8 ) ) ) ) ) => 381.23/49.05 ( ( ![X10:$i]: 381.23/49.05 ( ( in @ X10 @ nat ) => 381.23/49.05 ( ( X6 ) != ( n_pl @ ( ordsucc @ X4 ) @ X10 ) ) ) ) => 381.23/49.05 ( ( X6 ) = ( ordsucc @ X4 ) ) ) ) ) ) ))). 381.23/49.05 thf(zf_stmt_1, negated_conjecture, 381.23/49.05 (~( ![X4:$i]: 381.23/49.05 ( ( in @ X4 @ nat ) => 381.23/49.05 ( ![X6:$i]: 381.23/49.05 ( ( in @ X6 @ nat ) => 381.23/49.05 ( ( ~( ![X8:$i]: 381.23/49.05 ( ( in @ X8 @ nat ) => ( ( X6 ) != ( n_pl @ X4 @ X8 ) ) ) ) ) => 381.23/49.05 ( ( ![X10:$i]: 381.23/49.05 ( ( in @ X10 @ nat ) => 381.23/49.05 ( ( X6 ) != ( n_pl @ ( ordsucc @ X4 ) @ X10 ) ) ) ) => 381.23/49.05 ( ( X6 ) = ( ordsucc @ X4 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )), 381.23/49.05 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])). 381.23/49.05 thf(zip_derived_cl418, plain, (((sk__109) != (ordsucc @ sk__108))), 381.23/49.05 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_1])). 381.23/49.05 thf(zip_derived_cl416, plain, ( (in @ sk__110 @ nat)), 381.23/49.05 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_1])). 381.23/49.05 thf(zip_derived_cl420, plain, ( (in @ sk__109 @ nat)), 381.23/49.05 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_1])). 381.23/49.05 thf(zip_derived_cl417, plain, (((sk__109) = (n_pl @ sk__108 @ sk__110))), 381.23/49.05 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_1])). 381.23/49.05 thf(zip_derived_cl415, plain, ( (in @ sk__108 @ nat)), 381.23/49.05 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_1])). 381.23/49.05 thf(zip_derived_cl419, plain, 381.23/49.05 (![X0 : $i]: 381.23/49.05 (((sk__109) != (n_pl @ (ordsucc @ sk__108) @ X0)) | ~ (in @ X0 @ nat))), 381.23/49.05 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_1])). 381.23/49.05 thf(satz25, axiom, 381.23/49.05 (all_of @ 381.23/49.05 ( ^[X0:$i]: ( in @ X0 @ nat ) ) @ 381.23/49.05 ( ^[X0:$i]: 381.23/49.05 ( all_of @ 381.23/49.05 ( ^[X1:$i]: ( in @ X1 @ nat ) ) @ 381.23/49.05 ( ^[X1:$i]: 381.23/49.05 ( ( d_29_ii @ X1 @ X0 ) => ( moreis @ X1 @ ( n_pl @ X0 @ n_1 ) ) ) ) ) ))). 381.23/49.05 thf(zf_stmt_2, axiom, 381.23/49.05 (![X4:$i]: 381.23/49.05 ( ( in @ X4 @ nat ) => 381.23/49.05 ( ![X6:$i]: 381.23/49.05 ( ( in @ X6 @ nat ) => 381.23/49.05 ( ( ~( ![X8:$i]: 381.23/49.05 ( ( in @ X8 @ nat ) => ( ( X6 ) != ( n_pl @ X4 @ X8 ) ) ) ) ) => 381.23/49.05 ( ( ![X10:$i]: 381.23/49.05 ( ( in @ X10 @ nat ) => 381.23/49.05 ( ( X6 ) != ( n_pl @ ( n_pl @ X4 @ n_1 ) @ X10 ) ) ) ) => 381.23/49.05 ( ( X6 ) = ( n_pl @ X4 @ n_1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ))). 381.23/49.05 thf(zip_derived_cl349, plain, 381.23/49.05 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]: 381.23/49.05 (~ (in @ X0 @ nat) 381.23/49.05 | (in @ (sk__92 @ X0 @ X1) @ nat) 381.23/49.05 | ((X0) = (n_pl @ X1 @ n_1)) 381.23/49.05 | ((X0) != (n_pl @ X1 @ X2)) 381.23/49.05 | ~ (in @ X2 @ nat) 381.23/49.05 | ~ (in @ X1 @ nat))), 381.23/49.05 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_2])). 381.23/49.05 thf(satz4e, axiom, 381.23/49.05 (all_of @ 381.23/49.05 ( ^[X0:$i]: ( in @ X0 @ nat ) ) @ 381.23/49.05 ( ^[X0:$i]: ( n_is @ ( ordsucc @ X0 ) @ ( n_pl @ X0 @ n_1 ) ) ))). 381.23/49.05 thf(zf_stmt_3, axiom, 381.23/49.05 (![X4:$i]: 381.23/49.05 ( ( in @ X4 @ nat ) => ( ( ordsucc @ X4 ) = ( n_pl @ X4 @ n_1 ) ) ))). 381.23/49.05 thf(zip_derived_cl274, plain, 381.23/49.05 (![X0 : $i]: (((ordsucc @ X0) = (n_pl @ X0 @ n_1)) | ~ (in @ X0 @ nat))), 381.23/49.05 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_3])). 381.23/49.05 thf(zip_derived_cl350, plain, 381.23/49.05 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]: 381.23/49.05 (~ (in @ X0 @ nat) 381.23/49.05 | ((X0) = (n_pl @ (n_pl @ X1 @ n_1) @ (sk__92 @ X0 @ X1))) 381.23/49.05 | ((X0) = (n_pl @ X1 @ n_1)) 381.23/49.05 | ((X0) != (n_pl @ X1 @ X2)) 381.23/49.05 | ~ (in @ X2 @ nat) 381.23/49.05 | ~ (in @ X1 @ nat))), 381.23/49.05 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_2])). 381.23/49.05 thf(zip_derived_cl17713, plain, ($false), 381.23/49.05 inference('eprover', [status(thm)], 381.23/49.05 [zip_derived_cl418, zip_derived_cl416, zip_derived_cl420, 381.23/49.05 zip_derived_cl417, zip_derived_cl415, zip_derived_cl419, 381.23/49.05 zip_derived_cl349, zip_derived_cl274, zip_derived_cl350])). 381.23/49.05 381.23/49.05 % SZS output end Refutation 381.23/49.05 381.23/49.05 381.23/49.05 % Terminating... 381.23/49.14 % Runner terminated. 381.23/49.15 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting 381.23/49.15 EOF